?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Ys
ysabel
..:: .::: .:: .::.::.:.: .. ..:: .::: .:: ....

May 2011
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

Ys [userpic]

I doubt this is really news for anyone, but it's an interesting analysis anyway: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

Current Mood: restlessrestless
Comments

I just heard about it this morning. Thanks for the link!

I suppose having one's worst fears confirmed is vindication, but frankly I'd rather be wrong...

And even if you get past being angry about a tampered election, that doesn't change the way a fairly substantial part of the country really did vote for Bush. That, to me, is a systemic problem that's been there longer than Bush and could really bite us in the butt in the future.

(Anonymous)
Salon.com disagrees...

"Was the 2004 election stolen? No."
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/06/03/kennedy/

"In Rolling Stone, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that new evidence proves that Bush stole the election. But the evidence he cites isn't new and his argument is filled with distortions and blatant omissions."

Just sayin', is all

-ringloss
http://ringloss.blogspot.com/