?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Ys
ysabel
..:: .::: .:: .::.::.:.: .. ..:: .::: .:: ....

May 2011
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

Ys [userpic]

So, J. Michael Bailey, the dickhead who lied and was otherwise just a dick while trying to demonstrate that transsexuals don't exist has apparently published a new study.

Bisexuals don't exist. (NY Times article)

Why am I immensely doubtful about the results of this new study, or his care in reporting on the subject in the mainstream media? (Bailey's penchant for promoting homosexual eugenics might play a small part in my doubt, I'll admit.)

Current Mood: pissed offpissed off
Comments

Jesus fuck... I could even read all that because my brain instantly went, "WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT! STFU N00B!" -_-'

That jackass got another job? AT NORTHWESTERN?

Same job. He resigned as Chair but still has his position as professor.

Ooookay, NU. I read that originally (in the first link) as NYU. Bad brain, don't do that.

What the SHIT?!?!

What a jackoff.

. . .

I always knew I was a figment of someone's imagination. I just thought it would be someone, you know, cooler.

I love following the money. Today, it got me here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Consumer_Freedom

Now I just need to find a decent place to start for following THIS study's money.

Oh, it's only bisexual men. According to the same guy, all women are bisexual.

And anyone who says otherwise, particularly from personal experience as someone who doesn't exist, is deluded or lying. Mostly lying.

Hi, I've read this guy's stuff. It's bullshit!

Shame he got picked up by NPR today, too. ;_;